Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Neal

Pages: 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 [67] 68 69
991
JD Sports Forum! / Re: Lakers suck
« on: January 24, 2006, 10:13 AM »
I don't know about that guys.  You stick Kobe Bryant on the most any NBA team and he would be very, very valuable don't you think? 

Of course he would.  But that doesn't mean he'll win the MVP.  Being a lifetime fan of Michael Jordan, I know how the voters work.  Realistically, Jordan should've been the MVP every season he played in (except for his first two seasons, his first comeback season, and the Washington Wizards years) ... but he "only" won the award five times.  In 1989, Jordan played point guard for half of the season.  He averaged (AVERAGED!!!) 32.5 points, 8 rebounds, and 8 assits for an entire season, and he didn't win the MVP award.  That year, he had something like 15+ triple doubles, and a string of 7 or 8 games straight with a TD.  Still no MVP.  The award doesn't always go to the best player ... as exibited last year by Steve Nash winning it.

992
JD Sports Forum! / Re: Lakers suck
« on: January 24, 2006, 08:00 AM »
I still don't think Kobe is going to win the MVP this year even if he does average 36 PPG.  I think the award is for the player most valuable to their team, but on a team that wins.  And we all know the Lakers are going nowhere.  I'd say Dirk Nowitzki (31-10 Mavericks), Chauncey Billups (33-5 Pistons), Steve Nash (26-14 Suns) or even Timmy! (31-10 Spurs) is going to win the award.  Even if the Lakers make the playoffs they are going out in a round or two and they are not winning a championship this year or anytime soon.

Agreed.  I do think Kobe means more to his team than any of the players you mentioned, but unless they somehow manage to win close to 50 games, he won't win the MVP.  And he won't break Wilt's record of 100 points.  As amazing as his 81 points were, he was still 19 away from the record.
Also, let's not forget LeBron James when we talk about possible MVP candidates.
 ;)

993
JD Sports Forum! / Re: Lakers suck
« on: January 23, 2006, 01:07 PM »
Kobe is sick.  81 points is just unreal.

Exactly.  When I first read it in print this morning, it didn't register with me what I was reading.  Seeing that I wasn't alive in '62 when Wilt scored 100, that amount of points just doesn't seem possible.

994
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Top 5 Hotties
« on: January 23, 2006, 11:01 AM »
She's rather cute:



995
JD Sports Forum! / Re: Lakers suck
« on: January 23, 2006, 08:46 AM »
I'll have to keep an eye on ESPN Classic.  It's a given that they'll be running this game sometime soon.  I'll have to record that one.
Damn.

996
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Rebelscum
« on: January 18, 2006, 04:43 PM »
Post counts only prove that certain people have more free time than other people... coughcoughDarth_Raynecoughcough ;)

Sorry buddy, I had to take the shot.



And you can go **** yourself!
  ;D

997
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Top 5 Hotties
« on: January 18, 2006, 08:25 AM »
I wasn't that impressed by Drew Barrymore.  I rarely recommend that a woman should put a bra on, but in this case, she needed one.

998
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Top 5 Hotties
« on: January 17, 2006, 08:15 AM »
If that sheet could talk.....

The stories it would tell...... :P

I know ... and they'd all have me involved in them.
 :o

Scarlett Johansson had on a heck of a dress for the Golden Globes.



Globes...

She can fill out a dress, can't she?  Very nice.

999
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Rebelscum
« on: January 17, 2006, 08:12 AM »
Someone should tell that person that you need to paint the drywall after you tape and spackle it.

Eh.  Why bother?  If they didn't already know that to begin with, telling them now would just be wasted breath.
 ;)

1000
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Rebelscum
« on: January 13, 2006, 10:30 AM »
I really truly appreciate everyone who said something.



No problem.  Us banned RS members have to stick together.
 ;)

1001
Would it be that different?  Really?

1002
http://www.snopes.com/photos/animals/cyclopes.asp

Cyclopes

Claim: Photograph shows Cyclopes, a kitten born with only one eye.

Status: True.

Example: [Associated Press, 2006]

Origins: Many viewers were tempted to write off the above-displayed photograph, distributed by the Associated Press on 9 January 2006, as a fabrication because it seemed so far outside their realm of experience. However, the congenital abnormality exhibited by this kitten, although not common, has been observed and documented before in a variety of
species.

Cyclopia (or synophthalmia) is a birth defect in which a normally two-eyed animal is born with only a single fused eye, generally disproportionately large and centered on the face above the area where the nose would usually appear. Typically in cyclopic births the nose is either absent or present as an appendage located above the single eye. (Eyelids are also generally absent in such births, which explains why the eye of the one-day-old kitten pictured above is open even though cats are usually born with their eyes shut and remain in that condition for the first week or two of their lives.)

Pictures of cyclopic animals can be found on a variety of web sites (not recommended for sensitive viewers), including a site with photographs of a cyclopic goat, and another site displaying photographs of a number of feline deformities including cyclopia.

Last updated: 10 January 2006

Well, there you go.

1003
I've heard some people claiming this photo is a fake.  The kitten only lived for one day, and I guess kittens don't open their eyes until they're around 10-days-old.  Then again, most kittens don't have one giant eye that takes up their entire face, so who knows if the typical standards hold true in this case.

1004
JD Sports Forum! / Re: Lakers suck
« on: January 10, 2006, 07:36 PM »
Nope.  He scored over 40 a bunch of games in a row, but he never did this.  The other two were Wilt Chamberlain and Elgin Baylor.

1005
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Top 5 Hotties
« on: January 10, 2006, 01:21 PM »
Katherine currently has a place in my "top ten" ... but she has yet to crack my "top five".  My list will frequently change, but right now it consists of:

#5 - Jessica Alba


#4 - Evangeline Lilly


#3 - Jennifer Love Hewitt


#2 - Monica Bellucci


#1 - Laetitia Casta

Pages: 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 [67] 68 69