Everything Rebelscum

[Bob Crane]

Okay, so now the question is am I gonna get some royalties for use of my dog's image.   

Have you paid your dues Jack?



. . . Yes sir,
the check is in the mail.

[Rob]

I'll let you know when it gets here.

[C]

Also, there was a running joke for 20 minutes that I was Carpeteria's dad - in a nonsense thread I made to make fun of two other nonsense threads.

indeed; word to the wise (though it should be painfully obvious): don't start or contribute to any threads in which you attempt to accept parentage of another board member. it is likely you will be considered more trouble than you are worth. nasty letters all around. beware.

[Diddly]

Looks like someone bumped up a bunch of 2 year old threads that Virex started.

Hmm.

[hansolo_506]

The latest additions to the asylum..anewman and evilsand..are a parent's wet dream.  They are either highly stupid or members that have been banned. Either way, they only add to the downward spiral.

[Diddly]

HOLY CRAP! You're right 506..... those two are something else.

[Darth Kenobi]

Yeah those two people are something else.  I like how everyone jumps on everyone else right now for either bumping up those old threads or jumping on new members who there think are old/banned members of those fourms. 

[Vator]

In memorium:


Your account has been banned or locked havoc in wuhers 


Race to the finish boys....race to the finish 

Vator

BNT

Eparg

Rotav

anewman

[[DSS]Pedr0]

Now that is pretty lame.... 

[The Collector]

Now that is pretty lame.... 

I agree. You're not really hurting the administration when you do that. You are annoying the posters and viewers.

[CorranHorn]

Now that is pretty lame.... 

I agree. You're not really hurting the administration when you do that. You are annoying the posters and viewers.

thats quite true, but i dont think jedidefender needs to see this kind of stuff occuring here

[Vator]

Actually, it was a follow up to an expirement I have done there befour. The question again was how would the memebership act towards a newbie with obvious problems, much like the Bangs incident last year.

My hypothesis was that I would be flammed for 'grammer', be called an old memeber, and banned within the day. The expiriment went rather well, in my opinion. I got everything I wanted to know out of it, and it aleviated some boredom.

The Results?
It is conclusive to me that infact Wuhers is unexcepting, paranoid and largley populated and modded by the Extended Learning Time crowd.

My question for an RS moderator is this, had I been a new member, would you really have banned this new member for 'havoc in wuhers'. If so, what justification did you have? I don't think the TOS were violated by the 'new' kid, were they? If so, then wouldn't that just prove that you run a crooked administration?

[Jeff]

So, were you ALL of those guys that were acting crazy (anewman, evilsith, MrSparkie, yodaboi) or were you just anewman and the rest were actually other people acting crazy?

[Rob]

My hypothesis was that I would be flammed for 'grammer', be called an old memeber, and banned within the day. The expiriment went rather well, in my opinion. I got everything I wanted to know out of it, and it aleviated some boredom.

But you ARE an old member.

[JoshEEE]

I don't think harassing the staff over there is cool, even if you're doing it "for an experiment".  I know I personally had to ban a couple of your accounts at some point and it's a shame to see that all this time later you still think it's funny to start up fake accounts just to go aggravate the staff and members of a site you've been banned from.

It seems sort of petty and childish to me.