Author Topic: ROTS Picture Thread  (Read 36650 times)

Offline DSJ™

  • Staff Member
  • Jedi Council Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22171
  • Bouncy! Bouncy! I'm An Insane Kubrickaholic!™
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #120 on: February 15, 2005, 03:33 PM »
You passed!   :-*

Offline DSJ™

  • Staff Member
  • Jedi Council Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22171
  • Bouncy! Bouncy! I'm An Insane Kubrickaholic!™
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #121 on: February 16, 2005, 10:12 AM »

Offline Brian

  • Jedi Sentinel
  • *
  • Posts: 11081
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #122 on: February 17, 2005, 03:20 PM »


 :)

Also, if you have Hyperspace, there is a 45 image photo gallery available now from ROTS.  Most of it has been seen before, but much of it is better quality, and a few new pictures.

Offline Holographic Elvis

  • Jedi Apprentice
  • *
  • Posts: 1978
  • I'll punch you in the junk!
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #123 on: February 17, 2005, 04:43 PM »

Offline Holographic Elvis

  • Jedi Apprentice
  • *
  • Posts: 1978
  • I'll punch you in the junk!
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #124 on: February 17, 2005, 04:45 PM »

Offline Holographic Elvis

  • Jedi Apprentice
  • *
  • Posts: 1978
  • I'll punch you in the junk!
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #125 on: February 17, 2005, 04:45 PM »



Offline Famine

  • Noderator
  • Jedi Master
  • *
  • Posts: 5050
  • Who watches The Famine?
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #126 on: February 17, 2005, 04:56 PM »




WOAH! EMPTY CLOAKS! Lucas...is getting it right this time?

Kevin
The picture kept, will remind me...

Offline Mikey D

  • Jedi Knight
  • *
  • Posts: 3346
  • Lost soul
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #127 on: February 17, 2005, 04:59 PM »

WOAH! EMPTY CLOAKS! Lucas...is getting it right this time?

Kevin

They're Obi Wans and Anakins.  The only dead Jedi in that pic is Dooku.
Common sense isn't so common

Offline Morgbug

  • Old
  • Jedi Guardian
  • *
  • Posts: 16000
  • mmm. pemmican.
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #128 on: February 17, 2005, 05:05 PM »
Too...much...information.   

Presumably that shot is shortly after the video clip Dale posted and why we don't see Obi in the picture. 
Minivans: a sign of the apocalypse.

Offline Scott

  • Staff Member
  • Jedi Guardian
  • *
  • Posts: 18324
  • Get Some
    • View Profile
    • JediDefender
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #129 on: February 17, 2005, 05:07 PM »


The eerie similarities of this shot to 9/11 has to be intentional.  Wow, that is striking

Offline Famine

  • Noderator
  • Jedi Master
  • *
  • Posts: 5050
  • Who watches The Famine?
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #130 on: February 17, 2005, 09:00 PM »
Look at the big looming shadow sweeping over the city.

That's creepy.

Kevin


 :-[ Damn. No missing Jedi bodies.
The picture kept, will remind me...

SilverZ

  • Guest
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #131 on: February 17, 2005, 09:53 PM »
The eerie similarities of this shot to 9/11 has to be intentional.  Wow, that is striking

Yeah, seems to have already picked up the name "Jedi 9/11" around the boards. Ballsy, that's for sure. They've finally managed to cram some emotion into the dull establishing shots. I think its brilliant.

All of today's leaks are pretty dang cool, actually. Love the temple slaughter image most of all.

Every shot seems to relate directly to story with zero fluff.

Offline Holographic Elvis

  • Jedi Apprentice
  • *
  • Posts: 1978
  • I'll punch you in the junk!
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #132 on: February 17, 2005, 10:40 PM »

Offline Holographic Elvis

  • Jedi Apprentice
  • *
  • Posts: 1978
  • I'll punch you in the junk!
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #133 on: February 17, 2005, 10:41 PM »

Offline Holographic Elvis

  • Jedi Apprentice
  • *
  • Posts: 1978
  • I'll punch you in the junk!
    • View Profile
Re: ROTS Picture Thread
« Reply #134 on: February 17, 2005, 10:42 PM »