I don't know how much faith I have in the system (especially in areas like CA and the "media capitols") but I was not there and don't know if he did the things he was accused of or not. I would like to think he didn't do the things he was accused of... but I am not sure one way or the other.
Either way, this is how I look at it... I would rather him be found "not guilty" if he did do it than to be found "guilty" if he didn't do it.
I know that is not a great way to look at it, but seeing someone being found guilty when they are innocent is the worst.
Our legal system is still screwed up though. Murderers get off for killing innocent people... judges don't give the death penalty for a mass murderer... etc. How come so many say it's ok to kill an unborn baby, but not to kill a serial killer? Bah.
Anyways, if he's truly innocent (and he could be), then thank God he was not judged as being guilty.