Jeff is to nice a guy to say that your questions suck.
Since mine suck too, I will not say it either.
ORLY? Didn't you just say it in that first line?
I recently added several questions that you may now
legitimately feel 'suck' for your enjoyment
So, my question about beasts is the same as the others? Since I don't have the time to look up backdated info..the other Q's on this matter cited examples mirroring my Q? they suggested pack-ins too? If all that were true then I guess someone DID ask the same thing and I'm good with that explanation then.
I can understand editing for EXACT same questions..though I just feel other 'speculation editing' kinda sucks really. Why? because we don't work for Hasbro or speak for them..so how can we really honestly edit for them?(though predictable as they are we can't guarantee 100% what they say) I've noticed that say 30 questions go before Hasbro a week(all sites)..they seem to give an honest, non-vague, non-blow-off answer to only a few. If we left the editing up to Hasbro the program would be dead in a week because ..for good PR they would only select a few Q's that they would want to answer (after several submitted). Folks would tire of the rejection of it real quick.
While I feel MWB has done a nice job in here. I honestly am no longer amused with this ****** program. BTW --I know I'm not alone on this. Many others including staff have countless times expressed their disdain for Hasbro's replies. To me..it seemed like a novel idea to Hasbro at first and now that so many Q's have been asked and are now edited..coupled with 'Hasbro answer conditioned' editors what they assume Hasbro won't like..the program seems to be falling to ****(by Hasbro design!?!).
I also feel it 'self-full and egotystical' the comments I see here criticizing other websites about a Q asked that's been asked before ect. Sure we wanna be a great site but to the low expense of Hammering others because they don't have a cool editor and they actually, humanly missed a duplicate Q? Perfection or Alienating? What because our site is so awesome that we didn't make that mistake? I guess we as a site can all pat ourselves on our backs then.
I think the focus should be towards Hasbro being ridiculous here. Everyone should have the equal opportunity to have their Q asked/forwarded..if there was something in the Q that could be worked/edited than that should be worked with the poster to get his/her Q in. I've seen 'questions' submitted (passed the cool editing program)that really read like statements. I think that really Sucks IMO--it is after all a QandA thread and not a Statement and response thread.
You should ask yourselves though.. "Hasbro weekly Q and A"
How many 'answers' does Hasbro provide? You can't count ducks and dodges either.
Thoroughly disgruntled with Hasbro and weak support responders--
The DS