61
Bringing Balance to the Force
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
62
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Dreamweaver questions/advice
« on: March 4, 2006, 01:51 PM »
Thanks for the response. I wanted to see if any users thought there was a huge leap between the two versions.
Certainly, I'm not going to complain about the education prices for either version, especially compared to the prices you listed!
Certainly, I'm not going to complain about the education prices for either version, especially compared to the prices you listed!
63
Watto's Junk Yard / Dreamweaver questions/advice
« on: February 28, 2006, 01:50 PM »
I'm to the point where I'm ready to make the next leap in web programming from basic HTML to Dreamweaver.
As a student at a University, I've got a few options to purchase a couple of versions of Adobe/Macromedia's software at reduced prices:
1) Studio MX 2004 $117
2) Studio MX 2004 with Flash MX 2004 $145
3) Studio 8 $299
4) Dreamweaver 8 $199
Any Dreamweaver users here that can comment on the differences between the MX 2004 and 8 versions or the differences between the Flash included in Studio MX 2004 and Flash MX 2004? Any suggestions?
Thanks!
As a student at a University, I've got a few options to purchase a couple of versions of Adobe/Macromedia's software at reduced prices:
1) Studio MX 2004 $117
2) Studio MX 2004 with Flash MX 2004 $145
3) Studio 8 $299
4) Dreamweaver 8 $199
Any Dreamweaver users here that can comment on the differences between the MX 2004 and 8 versions or the differences between the Flash included in Studio MX 2004 and Flash MX 2004? Any suggestions?
Thanks!
64
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Top 5 Hotties
« on: February 7, 2006, 05:17 PM »
Here's the Vanity Fair cover that is supposed to be out tomorrow:
linky
Apparently, it was supposed to be even better, but Rachel McAdams backed out.
I'm not sure what's up with Scarlett's face - looks like she has way too much makeup on...
linky
Apparently, it was supposed to be even better, but Rachel McAdams backed out.
I'm not sure what's up with Scarlett's face - looks like she has way too much makeup on...
65
JD Sports Forum! / Re: Super Bowl XL Pittsburgh vs Seattle
« on: January 26, 2006, 10:51 AM »
Ugh, I just finally got the cojones to make my way back into this thread.
I was really impressed with the Steelers - they certainly deserve it after the way they've been playing the last month or two. A number of the fans around us at Mile High were really hard on Jake, but the Broncos got down and essentially became a drop-back passing team, which isn't their offense. Oh well, there's always next year...
Anyways, time to revert to the rule of cheering on the AFC team in the Super Bowl (except in the years where the Raiders are in the SB, of course
).
I was really impressed with the Steelers - they certainly deserve it after the way they've been playing the last month or two. A number of the fans around us at Mile High were really hard on Jake, but the Broncos got down and essentially became a drop-back passing team, which isn't their offense. Oh well, there's always next year...
Anyways, time to revert to the rule of cheering on the AFC team in the Super Bowl (except in the years where the Raiders are in the SB, of course
).
66
JD Sports Forum! / Re: NFL 2005-06 (Now with Playoffs!)
« on: January 22, 2006, 11:46 AM »
I second what Ryan had to say - wanted to stop in before I started to get ready to head down to Mile High to say
Go Broncos!!!
Go Broncos!!!
67
JD Sports Forum! / Re: NFL 2005-06 (Now with Playoffs!)
« on: January 17, 2006, 10:37 AM »
Need to check in here to make sure the board doesn't tip too much to the Steelers side. 
Go Broncos!
Needless to say, the Broncos are going to have to find a way to run the ball better than they did against the Pats.
It'll be interesting to see how many Steelers fans find their way into Invesco Field on Sunday. I went to the Broncos-Steelers game a couple of years back and had never seen so many vistors fans throughout the stadium at a Broncos game.
Go Broncos!
Needless to say, the Broncos are going to have to find a way to run the ball better than they did against the Pats.
It'll be interesting to see how many Steelers fans find their way into Invesco Field on Sunday. I went to the Broncos-Steelers game a couple of years back and had never seen so many vistors fans throughout the stadium at a Broncos game.
68
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Rebelscum
« on: January 7, 2006, 12:10 PM »
Heck, if you are all going to be dressing alike, I thought the natural choice would be pink sweaters...
69
JD Sports Forum! / Re: College Football 2005-2006
« on: January 5, 2006, 04:54 PM »
What a great game - right up there with the Ohio St. - Miami championship game from a few years ago.
Vince Young was simply amazing.
While I understand Mack Brown is a good coach and Texas has been a very good team for quite a while, it's just a bit strange to hear Mack Brown getting "coaching points" in a big game after all of these years.
Vince Young was simply amazing.
Two coaching points to the Texas Longhorns
While I understand Mack Brown is a good coach and Texas has been a very good team for quite a while, it's just a bit strange to hear Mack Brown getting "coaching points" in a big game after all of these years.
70
JD Sports Forum! / Re: JD Fantasy Football 2005 - Season open at yahoo.com
« on: January 5, 2006, 04:50 PM »
Congrats Kevin! I know I'm a bit late here, but it was a nice playoff run for you!
I'm looking forward to next year!
I'm looking forward to next year!
71
JD Sports Forum! / Re: JD Fantasy Football 2005 - Season open at yahoo.com
« on: December 17, 2005, 08:14 PM »
After watching the Bucs/Pats (27 total yards for Cadillac Williams) and up until the last 8 minutes of the KC/NYG game (Larry Johnson:177 total yards, 2 TD's; Tiki Barber 220 total yards, 1 TD up to this point), all I have to say is "no es bueno". 
Oh well, if I have to go down in fantasy football this week, hopefully things work out for the Broncos to clinch the AFC west this week.
Edit: Make that 242 yards and 2 TD's for Barber.
Yup, I'm toast.
Oh well, if I have to go down in fantasy football this week, hopefully things work out for the Broncos to clinch the AFC west this week.
Edit: Make that 242 yards and 2 TD's for Barber.
Yup, I'm toast.
72
JD Sports Forum! / Re: JD Fantasy Football 2005 - Season open at yahoo.com
« on: December 16, 2005, 01:48 PM »
I need to work on my voodoo curse on Larry Johnson and Tiki Barber this week. I can score some points, but if Kevin can rack up 80+ points again this week, I'm toast.
73
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: RS deletes accounts
« on: December 15, 2005, 04:49 PM »
Bunch'a trouble makers over here, I tell ya' - gettin' banned and what not. 
74
JD Sports Forum! / Re: NFL Regular Season 2005-06
« on: December 12, 2005, 05:44 PM »
Davis is good and Jonathan Wells is OK, but neither is Reggie Bush. They can draft Bush (assuming he declares for the draft) and trade Davis to start to build an offensive line.
Extra points are right around 20 yard kicks, so the 31-yarder is a bit longer. You don't see many missed from that distance and you certainly don't see many that close in that miss that badly, without any wind or snap/hold issues.
Extra points are right around 20 yard kicks, so the 31-yarder is a bit longer. You don't see many missed from that distance and you certainly don't see many that close in that miss that badly, without any wind or snap/hold issues.
75
JD Sports Forum! / Re: JD Fantasy Football 2005 - Season open at yahoo.com
« on: December 11, 2005, 08:02 PM »
Final
The Famine - 84.83
Dressels Vengeance - 63.66
Dang, that's a ton of points, on both accounts.
So, Kevin, are your beloved Giants going to keep Johnson in check next week?