This has nothing to do w/ expansion franchises such as the Rangers and Astros.
True, it doesn't have anything to do with any of those particular franchises, but I'm just proving a point on how there are other teams that have gone thru decades of futility with out a so called "curse" being the reason. The Sox are not the only team to suffer thru that.
For anyone to compare the Red Sox to any other unfortunately franchise is just plain ignorant.
OK, so is it fair to compare the Red Sox to a franchise like the Phillies, who have been in the league even longer than the Sox and have won a whole whopping 1 WS? That's about 125 yrs of baseball for that franchise and 1 world series to show for it. That means 124 yrs they have NOT won it. That sure makes the Red Sox 86 yrs of not winning one sure seem more feasable, if another team can go even longer without winning one (which by the way was 100 yrs until the Phillies got on the board). And they don't have a curse. So why can they have 10 decades of coming up short be due to many other reasons besides some curse, but not have the same apply to the Sox? You call it a curse, I call it a coincidence that it started after selling Ruth.
But then they sold the best pitcher of his time
Babe Ruth, a better pitcher than Walter Johnson or Grover Alexander, who are also of the Babes time? I don't know about calling a pitcher who had 3, maybe 4 real good yrs as a pitcher better than 2 of the all time great pitchers in the history of the game.