Quote from: Morgbug on October 20, 2005, 11:57 PM

Ohmygod guys, if you're going to whine about missing points because you had to leave a guy on the bench I'll can the ******* league right now.   Honestly, how many TD's have I left on the bench because I couldn't play all my wide receivers this year (the answer is six, btw).  Same ******* thing in hockey. 

Here's a suggestion, I tolerated all the discussion with its inherent lack of maturity.  The decision is made.  Grow up or **** off.  Ok?

Easy there Brent.  Jamie and I talked on the phone not long ago 2nite and we both agreed that we didn't see the max game cap at the beginning of the season and like 2 of the "no" votes were actual "I could go either way" votes, so you gotta know people aren't sold on this max game cap.  Like I said via PM, I think those voting "no" don't fully grasp what they are voting against.  They'll see in the long run when they run out of games early.  Despite what others say, there is no strategy involved with a game cap.  You may think a guy could go off on one team that nite and that another guy won't against his opponent and be completely wrong.  It's a guessing game, not strategy.  We should have done a head-to-head league because then you can utilize all your players.  Too late now, but I for one won't stop voicing my frustration if I have more nites like 2nite.  

Supposedly the scene at the end where Cary Elwes just saws through his leg is more graphic.  Can anyone confirm that is the only difference.  If so a pass for me.  Great flick.  Although the sequel looks disappointing with the been there done that type of thing.