6458
« on: January 18, 2012, 12:58 PM »
I can't say that I blame him in the least. After hearing "George Lucas raped my childhood" from way too many fanboys, why should he subject himself to more of that crap? It's become an abusive relationship where the fanboys have not grown to understand George Lucas's philosophy on filmmaking, and the spirit of innovation that he has used to move the film industry forward. He improved visual effects. He improved audio and visual presentation. He's been a driving force with CGI and animation. And he and Steven Spielberg essentially created the blockbuster. And in that spirit of innovation he has been guilty of trying to improve things in the movies where he originally felt like he had to compromise. That has not been as well received.
In contrast, what are the credentials of his detractors? It's all well and good to sit back as an amateur critic, but when you criticise someone's work, you had best have something to bring to the table. Because at the end of the day, how many of these fanboys have become filmmakers and have made something better? Where are their mountains of credits as screenwriters, directors, producers, etc? GL has definitely inspired a good number of people to get into filmmaking, but I suspect that they're not the ones who spend many a waking hour on the TFN message boards pouring over every flaw they perceive in someone else's film. On the contray: they've been inspired by Star Wars but are embracing their own creativity to do something new.
I have always felt that Lucas faced an uphill battle with the Prequels. Because he brought the films to kids, and they loved them. Having that kind of baggage of living up to a generation's worth of expectations is something that almost nobody could accomplish.