JediDefender.com Forums

Community => Watto's Junk Yard => Topic started by: Shannon (Princess) on February 20, 2005, 09:34 PM

Title: The New "Loonatics"
Post by: Shannon (Princess) on February 20, 2005, 09:34 PM

Has anyone seen these new versions of the Looney Tunes yet?  They have been turned into superheros in the future.  I think they look awful, and Buzz reminds me of Frank in "Donnie Darko"- no eyeballs...
Promo Short (http://news.toonzone.net/article.php?ID=1788)

Title: Re: The New "Loonatics"
Post by: Deanpaul on February 20, 2005, 10:00 PM

Quote from: Princess on February 20, 2005, 09:34 PM

Has anyone seen these new versions of the Looney Tunes yet?  They have been turned into superheros in the future.  I think they look awful, and Buzz reminds me of Frank in "Donnie Darko"- no eyeballs...
Promo Short (http://news.toonzone.net/article.php?ID=1788)

OMG Awful.

"You may think they look familiar..." No I don't.

Totally uncreative milking of a franchise. Those bastards. Please fail.

Title: Re: The New "Loonatics"
Post by: DSJ™ on February 20, 2005, 10:10 PM

Suffering Succotash!  >:(

Mel Blanc is rolling over in his grave.  (http://www.telusplanet.net/public/djustus/rip.gif)

Title: Re: The New "Loonatics"
Post by: Deanpaul on February 20, 2005, 10:11 PM

"I have nipples. Are you going to milk me, Faulker WB?"

Title: Re: The New "Loonatics"
Post by: Dressel Rebel on February 20, 2005, 10:32 PM

Quote from: Deanpaul on February 20, 2005, 10:11 PM

"I have breasts. Are you going to milk me, Faulker WB?"

Nipples are needed, according to ******'s criteria, I believe.

"Oh yeah, you can milk anything with nipples."

"I have nipples ******, can you milk me?"

EDIT:  Wow, his last name gets filtered.  It works when you write the movie title though, "Meet the Fockers."

Title: Re: The New "Loonatics"
Post by: Deanpaul on February 20, 2005, 10:37 PM

You're right, that's how it goes. It's been a while since I saw that.

I actually dislike this ew project more than that lame-o Bugs and Michael Jordan movie in the 90's. Ick.

Title: Re: The New "Loonatics"
Post by: Diddly on February 20, 2005, 11:09 PM

Wow, this looks REALLY gay. Way to **** all over the franchise.

Where is Futuristic Elmer Fudd? Or Futuristic Sylvester? Futuristic Foghorn Leghorn? If you're going to destroy a piece of history, at least burn it to the ground and piss on the ashes.

Title: Re: The New "Loonatics"
Post by: Ben on February 21, 2005, 12:14 AM

They cannot be serious.

This seriously has to be a joke.

No ******* way is anyone (even the ****heads at WB) going to market this with a straight face.

Title: Re: The New "Loonatics"
Post by: Bob Crane on February 21, 2005, 05:01 AM

That sucks more than anything that has ever sucked before...

Title: Re: The New "Loonatics"
Post by: Vator on February 21, 2005, 07:05 AM

Why that's the hardest little peice of suckage since, well the creation of suckage. Burn in hell WB!

Title: Re: The New "Loonatics"
Post by: Famine on February 21, 2005, 09:26 AM

They really have taken it too far. I saw a special about 3 days ago, and I threw my apple across the room at the tv. This does make me upset.

Kevin

Title: Re: The New "Loonatics"
Post by: SilverZ on February 21, 2005, 04:16 PM

Blame Teen Titans. WB needs characters they can milk in a similar way without sharing revenue.

Utter crap.