9256
Saga Collection '06 / Re: 2006 SDCC Exclusive 501st Legion Stormtrooper?
« on: April 22, 2006, 01:31 PM »
So who's going to San Diego and wants to help me procure 3 of these?? 
Bringing Balance to the Force
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
9257
Saga Collection '06 / Re: Possible VTSC Wave 2?
« on: April 22, 2006, 01:28 PM »
At least it's some crap mail-away and not part of the wave - but you're right. I'd have much rather it had been an Ghost of Anakin (old anakin) mail-away or some such thing.
9258
Saga Collection '06 / Re: 2006 vOTC (or vTSC) - now with pics!
« on: April 22, 2006, 02:18 AM »
11.99 around here - not 12.99
9259
Saga Collection '06 / Re: Possible VTSC Wave 2?
« on: April 22, 2006, 02:11 AM »I think Kenner did soft goods on the vintage Jawa just fine. hasbro doesn't seem to be as skilled at it, for some reason. And as far as these figs having features the vintage ones didn't, I don't think a continuing VTSC line can support an exact reproduction of the original line of figures. There has to be something 'new' about it (and like Pete said, these figs already betray the vintage concept in just their articulation) and new features, new figs, and so on will probably be the way to do it.
It's no secret that I disagree with the second half of your statement about the line needing to deviate from the original run, but as for the softgoods - Hasbro's been hit or miss IMO. For every Puffy Coat Obi-Wan or Sandtrooper, there's been a princes leia with a nice flexible white gown (see Hooded Commtech Chip). The Evolutions Softgoods on the Anakin and Sith Lord sets were great. They just need to use the right materials - ones that don't take their own shape. It's worked pretty well for many figures and can work pretty easily for the jawas if they just pick the right material and cut it tight enough.
Getting Qui-Gon Jinn or a Biggs or other non vintage figures onto shelves is what the regular TSC line is for. Otherwise, why even bother making this thing special and calling it vintage and reproduce original cards. It loses what makes it great IMO if you start fudging around with it.
9260
Saga Collection '06 / Re: Possible VTSC Wave 2?
« on: April 22, 2006, 12:59 AM »IMO that would open up a big can of worms. That wasn't a figure that came out in the 70's/80's so then it's not really a new-school 'vintage' item. I'd prefer that they leave the things that didn't come out back in the original days to the NEW lines and save this (so far perfect) line for the high-quality resculpts of the figures that were originally on these cardbacks.
So because the vintage Vader was never released with a removeable helmet a VOTC/VTSC version can't be?
Please don't think I'm trying to start an argument, but for example - no versions of Han Solo in the vintage line EVER came with a working holster - yet both the ANH VOTC Han and the ROTJ VTSC Han have a working holster. Same thing with Greedo - he didn't even have a holster sculpted to the leg. How about the X-Wing pilot Luke? The vintage figure didn't have a removeable lightsaber hilt that plugged into a socket on the figure. The vintage Biker Scout's ankle holster didn't work as a holster either.
What I'm getting is that so far, many of the figures have functional extras that go beyond articulation and detail that the vintage figures never had. So why couldn't one of the function features of a VTSC ROTJ Darth Vader be that it has a removeable helmet?
After reading your rationale, I can say that if they hadn't already done a VOTC Vader, I'd probably be inclined to agree with you.
9261
Saga Collection '06 / Re: Possible VTSC Wave 2?
« on: April 22, 2006, 12:28 AM »Personally, I'm hoping that the Vader will NOT be another ESB version and instead will be a ROTJ version with (keeping fingers crossed) a 2-piece helmet.
to get so many copies of the same Vader we already have.
IMO that would open up a big can of worms. That wasn't a figure that came out in the 70's/80's so then it's not really a new-school 'vintage' item. I'd prefer that they leave the things that didn't come out back in the original days to the NEW lines and save this (so far perfect) line for the high-quality resculpts of the figures that were originally on these cardbacks.
9262
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Top 5 Hotties
« on: April 21, 2006, 11:14 PM »
She looks nasty in most of those pictures - the bottom right corner might be the exception.
9263
Saga Collection '06 / Re: Possible VTSC Wave 2?
« on: April 21, 2006, 07:32 PM »They should make plastic cape and cloth cape variants of the Jawa!
And an ESB carded Vinyl caped Jawa chase figure.
9264
JD Sports Forum! / Re: JD Fantasy Basketball 2005
« on: April 21, 2006, 04:48 PM »
So that's it huh? No parade for the winner this year...
9265
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Gas Prices
« on: April 21, 2006, 04:33 PM »
Before all the talk about ethanol started, I'd read that the problem with Hydrogen was that it required so much energy to produce - same kind of deal as what we've been talking about.
Plus, there isn't an infrastructure in place to deliver hydrogen to cars.
We all need to just move out of the suburbs, into cities and then walk everywhere.
Plus, there isn't an infrastructure in place to deliver hydrogen to cars.
We all need to just move out of the suburbs, into cities and then walk everywhere.
9266
Saga Collection '06 / Re: 2006 vOTC (or vTSC) - now with pics!
« on: April 21, 2006, 04:31 PM »
As far as I'm concerned the Star Case they come in is part of the item.
9267
Saga Collection '06 / Re: Possible VTSC Wave 2?
« on: April 21, 2006, 03:59 PM »A $10+ VOTC/VTSC Imperial Dignitary? I'd like to see that one redone too, but only in the basic line.
In a heartbeat! Imagine a posable dignitary with a realistic looking sculpt under a (not too puffy) purple robe with a removable hat. Then put him on retro packaging and throw in a collector's coin and I'd drop $10.00 without thinking twice.
It would be ******* awesome.
9268
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Gas Prices
« on: April 21, 2006, 03:55 PM »
If you used Ethanol to make ethanol at a 1:1 ratio - you'd never produce a single net drop of ethanol. There would need to be some way to make it that wouldn't require as much energy as you'd get out of it.
Anyone know how much energy it takes to run an oil refinery? I'd be curious about how much oil a refinery uses to refine a gallon of gasoline.
Anyone know how much energy it takes to run an oil refinery? I'd be curious about how much oil a refinery uses to refine a gallon of gasoline.
9269
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Gas Prices
« on: April 21, 2006, 03:33 PM »
If it takes a gallon of oil to produce a gallon of ethanol, we don't decrease our dependence on oil-rich nations at all.
9270
Watto's Junk Yard / Re: Gas Prices
« on: April 21, 2006, 01:31 PM »
That sounds like the catch I was looking for.