I could've passed on the Mawhonic repack, but otherwise I'm okay with this case pack.  BTW, BBTS has more of these cases in stock as of today.

The wide shots of the bridge that was left intact were of NYC's Queensboro Bridge, otherwise known as the 59th Street Bridge.  I was surprised that this particular bridge would play a prominent role in the movie since it was also featured in a pretty big action sequence in the first Spiderman movie.

I thought the 'exile' bridge was the Queensboro since it had the cable car along side it (that runs from Manhattan to Roosevelt Island).

I wasn't sure about that one.  I mean, who knows a bridge by the footings at the water?  I for one wasn't sure that the "exile bridge" was the same bridge that was left intact.  From what I could tell Gotham had somewhere between 6 and 8 bridges.

Nolan's Batman trilogy definitely calls on multiple cities to stand in as Gotham.  In the first film and the second, it largely seemed to be Chicago.  And you can totally spot a lot of distinctive Chicago landmarks:  bridges over the Chicago river.  Buildings that are an indelible part of that skyline.  The elevated train and the roads underneath them.  And even the fire escapes / back stairs like those on Jim Gordon's apartment are something you see a lot in Chicago buildings.  It's interesting that Nolan decided to change things up after making Chicago stand in for Gotham as he did.  But seeing how the third act of The Dark Knight Rises transpired, Gotham clearly had to be an island city in order for that plot device to be carried out.  In that respect, Chicago just doesn't work.

The third film seems to be much more of an amalgam.  Chicago seems to have fallen by the wayside in lieu of Pittsburgh and New York.  Most of the bridges, skyline and riverfront are totally NYC.  The aerials even show 1 World Trade Center which is still under construction.  Lower Manhattan is part of the location for the Stock Exchange heist.  And the establishing shot that shows Wayne Manor sitting on the cliff across the river from Gotham is clearly set on New Jersey's Palisades cliffs near the George Washington Bridge.

The neighborhood scenes look much more like Pittsburgh.  Obviously, Heinz field is in there, too.  And some of downtown Pittsburgh seems to be the location for the police chasing Batman on the Batpod.


As for the movie?  I thought it was a good final act in the trilogy.  Granted, I'm coming from a place where I didn't have much of a history or connection with Batman comics.  When it came to comics, I was far more into reading Marvel titles.  I think that Nolan was interested in a character arc for Bruce Wayne that had a clear beginning, middle and end.  And I think that part of the story arc was that NOBODY, in the real world, could continue with such an obsession to be a vigilante like Batman indefinitely.  Not even a billionaire like Bruce Wayne.

I like the fact that we hadn't seen the last of the League of Shadows.  The League certainly seemed larger than just Ra's Al Ghul and the henchmen that were brought to Gotham in Batman Begins.  Tying Bane and his partner to the League presented a viable threat to Bruce and Batman since they know who he is, and his alter ego couldn't protect him or his loved ones the way he might have intended.

As for the end of the film?  I don't think it's worth getting into the physics/timeline of flying a bomb far enough offshore to get it to a safe distance.  I was more tied up in the fact that Nolan had established a real sense of jeopardy for Batman.  That, and the fact that for a while the audience really seemed to think that he had made the ultimate sacrifice in order to save the city.  It was not a happy ending in any sense of the word.  And perhaps that's why not everyone is onboard with this final chapter in the trilogy.  But I have to respect Christopher Nolan for bringing us a more complicated and dark interpretation of the Batman character, and treating the audience like adults.

As for Joseph Gordon Levitt's character?  I really thought that they were working towards him taking on the Robin role.  But the end of the movie changed that for me when he found the cave.  I almost have to wonder if Warner Brothers put some serious pressure on Nolan to give them some sort of sequel option they could use if they wanted to continue on wiht the Batman franchise given the continuity that he had established.

Scored a couple of Yavin Hangar Transports today.  Gotta love the deals at TJ Maxx!

I read about the Days of Future Past storyline in the past few days.  That was easily my favorite X-Men storyline of all time, and I've always felt a good degree of attachment to it.  But are we bound to see some significant changes to that particular story in order to make it work on screen?

Ellen Page has definitely come into her own as an actor since she played Kitty Pryde in X-Men: The Last Stand.  Will she and Wolverine still be the central characters in the movie adaptation?  And then there's the matter of the relationships.

There's clearly a continuity that's been established by the previous films that diverges from the books.  The film interpretation of the Phoenix storyline had to be scaled back tremendously.  But this story dealt with someone travelling from the future to the past in order to change the course of history.  How do you accomplish that in the movie and make it work?  That remains to be seen.

Quote from: Nicklab on August  1, 2012, 02:22 PM

I've seen remnants of this wave near me over the past few days.  It's nice to know that it's hitting the stores, but it would be nice to see it in more significant numbers.

Guessing you're talking about the Galen Marek/Shae Vizsla wave?

Correct!  Wrong thread.  My apologies.

I've seen remnants of this wave near me over the past few days.  It's nice to know that it's hitting the stores, but it would be nice to see it in more significant numbers.