« on: June 25, 2004, 07:52 PM »
If it's such bunk, then produce some evidence as to why you think it's not accurate. Christopher Hitchins wrote a good article on it, and it's probably one of the better assessments of the movie. He's a credible journalist. Are you? Or is it bunk because someone told you so?
Is some of what's in the movie true? Damn straight. Is some of it stilted to support Moore's viewpoint? It's likely.
I think everyone should see this movie just to see what this war is really like. It gets cleaned up a lot in network news editing before you see it on your tv at home. It's time for the American public to get a little reality and see how distasteful the truth is.
The real question everyone should be asking is why are all these people trying to slander Michael Moore? Some of it is to spin things to their way of thinking. The rest of it is that the "establishment" is afraid of him. They want to keep him on the fringe in an effort to keep him from showing the American public how much they're getting screwed over.