And for those saying "what if the owner didn't know and actually gave him chocoloate"...are you kidding? Anyone that doesn't know that dogs can't eat chocolate shouldn't own a ******* dog.
Have ya
been in Wuher's lately John?

j/k
Seriously though, I agree the kid seeking dog help was either lying and just wanted to make up something to talk about, or he was an idiot... or both.
But I seriously, and I mean this in all honesty, think there's people there that are dumb enough to feed a dog chocolate based on a post they read there. Either just to see what the effect is that caused all the hooplah, or because they're that stupid. Never underestimate people's ability to underwhelm you at any turn.
Given the post in the first place, I think it was a distinct threat that he could've fed the dog chocolate.
Had DD done that here I think he'd likely have been warned/talked to privately and all points would have been driven home pretty hard, but at the same time I love animals... My pets mean the world to me, and I didn't care for the comment said in jest or otherwise, but that's just my take on things.
His banning at Scum, IMO, is more out of pressure from the crowd than out of legitimate disgust at what the guy said... I mean, I see people blatantly calling one another names over at that site almost every time I browse through it and nothing is ever done... It seems to me that unless you either are trashing RS and its staff, calling RS on its BS, or if you have got the masses against you totally in a Simpson-esque mob/riot scenario, you really can't get banned at Scum for much of anything. You have to really be on one of the staff's ****list or it just doesn't happen generally. This time it seemed that so many people cried out in anger at once that finally someone stepped in just to make everyone happy.
At the same time mass mudslinging takes place in virtually every sector of the forums without even an edit or a thread lock... Unless the thread was a duplicate of one that is on page 73 or some ****.